Coon Law Jackson Attorney Blog

Technology has had an immeasurable impact on society. Electronic data now makes up the bulk of documentary evidence used by lawyers across the spectrum of practice areas. The word "bulk" is used by your writer purposefully. Massive amounts data can be stored electronically in a very small space and the plethora of electronic devices now available make it easier for people to access and use electronically stored information. The storage of data in binary code with ever friendlier user interfaces has ushered in the electronic age. This inevitably led lawyers down the path from electronic mail to electronic records to electronic discovery. Whether you are an attorney in Jackson, MS or an attorney in Mountain View, CA, you need to have an understanding of technology and how to effectively request and analyze large amounts of electronically stored data during discovery.

Moore's Law states that technologically develops exponentially, doubling the processing speeds and storage/memory capacity of computers roughly every two years. Consider that an audio CD holds 700 megabytes of data which is equivalent to 1,000 printed pages and a DVD holds roughly 60,000 printed pages worth of data. 60,000 printed pages could fill the bed of a small pick up truck. A megabyte was not too long ago considered a large amount of data, but now it is common to have a computer with 500 gigabytes (500,000 megabytes) of storage. One and two terabyte hard drives are sold in devices that are smaller than your hand. The library of congress contains roughly 10 terabytes of data and that amount of data could now fit in a bread box.

Much of the data used as evidence is held on external servers like cell phone providers, social networking websites and most recently cloud servers. The opposing attorney in your case will be asking for your emails, texts, Facebook entries and tweets. Client's have historically acted rashly when threatened with litigation and would destroy evidence. That is a horrible idea when it comes to electronically stored data. Most people know by now that the "delete" or "erase" button are misnomers. There are programs that "wipe" the disk drive clean and actually do erase documents but what many clients and attorneys do not realize is that these programs leave traces of themselves.

Even if somebody successfully erases electronic evidence, it is still possible to see that something was erased. I liken this to standing next to a garbage bag full of shredded paper. It doesn't look good. The courts recognize this and there are sanctions in place to penalize parties for erasing electronically stored information that may have been relevant. Every client and every attorney from McComb, MS to Michigan needs to remember that the duty to preserve electronically stored information attaches when litigation is reasonably foreseeable.

In order to effectively advocate Attorney's practicing in areas ranging from criminal law to family law to personal injury need to understand how to request and how to deal with the massive amounts of electronically stored data that now makes up most of the evidence in a given case. One way to deal with the amount of data received is to specifically ask for the data to be sent with metadata, hashtags and other referencing and indexing tools that will make the data searchable. There are many different tactics and technology that can be used to effectively use electronically saved data. The important thing is that your attorney be able to work in this growing area of the law and excel at collecting evidence in a world full of electronic data.

It should come as no surprise that after a divorce the mother is more likely than the father is to get custody. Most of the time the mother ends up with joint legal custody and sole physical custody of the child and the father ends up with rights to visitation and obligations of support. This writer/attorney doesn't argue that divorce and custody determinations ought to be made in favor of the father over the mother. This writer thinks that the importance of the father's role in raising children should be better understood and courts should be cognizant of the most recent research into this area.

This especially true in a society like ours with so many children living in situations where their parents are not longer together. In fact, studies have suggested that women are more likely to initiate a divorce because they are more likely to get the custody arrangement that is more desirable to them. It has also been shown that in states where custody laws have changed to place the divorced father on a more level footing for custody determinations, the divorce rates drop because women are apprehensive of losing control over the care of their children.

This is not to suggest that these mother's are diabolical and intent on ruining their husbands' lives. To the contrary, the studies show that mothers are highly concerned with their children's well-being and maintaining control over the upbringing of their children. This is commendable. However, mother's often do not understand how important the role of the father is to parenting. Most mothers do understand the need for their children's father to be present, but what they consider a sufficient "presence" is only about one half of the amount of time that experts consider to be a sufficient presence of the father in a child's life.

Current Research has brought the antiquated notions of gender roles in the upbringing of children into serious question. The idea that the mother is the primary care provider is fine until you enter a circumstance in which nearly half of marriages are ending in divorce. Divorce rates were nowhere near that level throughout the centuries in which the gender roles of parents were established and ingrained into the the cultural subconscious. Studies now show that the absence of sufficient paternal involvement in a child's upbringing can be seriously damaging. It affects them emotionally, mentally and is a serious impediment to their ability to adjust as they become adults and eventually being happy.

Without going too deep into statistics, it is worth pointing out that these studies suggest that as many as 25% of fathers are wholly uninvolved in the upbringing of their children after a divorce and that even the fathers that are involved have to deal with children who are often turned against them by the mother, with whom they share a much stronger bond. This causes serious damage to the child's ability to negotiate the difficulties of early adulthood and eventually find happiness. Contrary to historical gender roles of parents, the negative effects of absent or insufficiently present fathers are more severe for daughters than for sons. So daughters and not sons are more affected by the absence of the father. Sons were traditionally thought to need the presence of a male more than daughters.

Why are courts so hesitant to recognize the importance of the father in the upbringing of the child? The overriding factor for custody determinations is "the best interest of the child." Despite studies showing that the importance of the father to the emotional stability and overall mental health of the child, courts are painfully slow to recognize the importance of the father's role in raising children and that it is comparable to the importance of the role of the mother in assuring the best upbringing for the child. What fathers are fighting in court are the long held belief in the proper gender roles of parents. Put simply, courts are declaring, "the mom raises the kids and the dad provides the necessities because that's the way it is and that is the way it always has been. The truth is that is the way it was and children and fathers are both being harmed by these antiquated notions of gender roles that are being reenforced by the legal system through the actions of both the state legislatures and judiciaries.

Experts suggest that for a father to be sufficiently involved in a child's life they should take on 25% of the responsibility for raising the child and this would mean physical custody of the child. However, mothers generally do not want to give more than 10% of that responsibility to fathers. A few days per month is not nearly enough according to experts in the field but that is exactly what courts often declare to be adequate. Of course, all of this presupposes that both parents are fit parents and the writer does not suggest that unfit mothers or unfit fathers should be given more time with their children. What the writer suggests is abundantly clear is that there is a disconnect between the research into this field and what courts are concluding is in the "best interest of the child." These studies need to be brought to the attention of judges when they are important to the outcome of the case.

The importance of the mother's role in raising children cannot be denied and is not being denied by this writer/attorney. Advocating for the important role of the mother is a worthy cause and does help ensure the healthy upbringing of children and is protecting their best interest. However, the role of the father is also important. If the father is a fit parent and desires involvement in the lives of his children, the courts should not discourage this by treating him like a second class parent and neither should the mother. In making custody determinations, the best interest of the child must be the key factor. Whether that determination is made by a court or (hopefully) by an agreement between the mother and the father.

It is in the best interest of the child that both the mother and the father are happy with their custody agreement and that neither one feels like a second class parent. It is desirable that everyone including judges, attorneys, mothers, fathers, children and grandparents better understand modern scientific research into children of divorced parents and the effects of custody agreements on those children. If everyone keeps the best interest of the child at the heart of their decisions, society will see an increased appreciation of the role of the father in the upbringing of children and everyone including the mother will be better off for it.